About Assignment Scales
Gradebook allows you to choose from a number of scales to score each assignment:
Points: You can enter the number of points a student earned out of the total possible points.
You can enter non-negative numbers up to five digits and with two decimal places, such as 9.25 (out of 10 possible).
Percentage: You can enter a percentage to indicate the student's achievement on the assignment, or number of items answered correctly.
You can enter non-negative whole numbers, e.g. 85.
Text: You can enter notes about student performance on that assignment, track necessary information (such as group # or project
partners), or provide brief comments to students about an assignment. The maximum number of characters you can enter is 255.
Custom: Custom scales allow you to define scores or descriptors that distinguish meaningfully between different levels of performance on an assignment.
Choose a custom scale if you wish to use any of the following to describe student performance:
- Rubric or rating scale (e.g. Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor)
- Letter grade scale (e.g., A, B+, etc.)
- 4.0 or GPA scale
- Pass/Fail
- Credit/No Credit
This conversion table must be "customized" by you because agreement does not exist on how these scores or descriptors should map meaningfully onto a percentage scale. Acceptable scores on a GPA scale, for example, may range from 0.7 to 4.0, while acceptable scores on a percentage scale may range only between 65 and 100 - a smaller portion of the scale as a whole. Because GradeBook converts all scores to a percentage in order to calculate a student's total score for the class, the conversion table ensures that the meaning of your custom scale (what it communicates about student achievement) is preserved in this calculation. If a straight mathematical conversion is used instead of professional judgment, students (especially those with lower scores) may be unduly penalized.
EXAMPLE: In Professor Meyer's class, students are graded on both exams and papers. Meyer scores exams using a percentage scale, but uses a 4.0 scale to score papers. On this scale, Meyer uses only 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, and 1.5 because she feels these grades meaningfully distinguish between levels of performance. In general, a paper that scores a 2.0 may be largely underdeveloped or demonstrate major misconceptions, a performance she associates with C- work. If Meyer chooses a "points" scale to score her papers, however, she encounters a problem: scores receive a straight mathematical conversion, so that students who earn a 2.0 on a paper will receive only 50% on the percentage scale - a failing grade according to traditional measures. By using a custom scale, Meyer ensures that the percentage conversions reflect her intentions.
| Points (mathematical conversion to percentage) | Custom (intentional conversion) |
| 4.0 = 100% | 4.0 = 100% |
| 3.5 = 87.5 | 3.5 = 92 |
| 3.0 = 75 | 3.0 = 84 |
| 2.5 = 62.5 | 2.5 = 76 |
| 2.0 = 50 | 2.0 = 68 |
| 1.5 = 37.5 | 1.5 = 60 |
EXAMPLE: Professor Berg assigns challenging problem sets as homework. He is most interested in seeing how his students approach each problem, not whether they solve the problem correctly. He uses a 3-point rubric and a custom scale to communicate his emphasis on process over product.
| Rubric scores | Custom scale |
| 3 - Effective strategies and correct answer | 3 = 100% |
| 2 - Effective strategies, incorrect answer | 2 = 95% |
| 1 - Attempted, ineffective strategies | 1 = 85% |